VISION Registry

This study was a nonrandomized evaluation of the MULTI-LINK RX VISION™ Coronary Stent System (CSS) in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. The primary objective of this registry was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MULTI-LINK RX VISION CSS. The study was designed as an open-label, nonrandomized registry that enrolled 268 male and female patients who satisfied the entry criteria. Safety and efficacy of the MULTI-LINK RX VISION CSS were evaluated by analyzing all endpoints and adverse events. The primary endpoint was analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis and all secondary endpoints were analyzed on per protocol evaluable patients.

Location

22 US and international clinical sites


Sample Size

268 enrolled patients


Key Trial Dates

Enrollment began: August 2001

Trial completed: June 2002


Trial Design

A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, consecutive enrollment registry


Key Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Some inclusion and exclusion criteria for this trial are listed below. More specific criteria were used in screening candidates for this registry.

Inclusion

Exclusion


Primary and Secondary Endpoints

Primary Endpoint

Secondary Endpoints


Regulatory Approval Status

Device received FDA approval in 2003.


Key Results

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MULTI-LINK VISION CSS by comparing the clinical results to the results of the FDA approved MULTI-LINK TETRA™ CSS. The patient population in the VISION Registry was similar to that of the TETRA Registry, both in demographic and angiographic vessel and lesion characteristics; thus the assumption of treatment group comparability was supported.

Acute and early outcomes were similar in the VISION Registry compared with the TETRA Registry. This was demonstrated by the comparable rates of device success, procedure success, SAT, 30-day MACE, and TVF. In the VISION registry, the 180-day TVF rate was 6.7% compared with the 180-day TVF rate of 12.8% (P = 0.0346) in the TETRA Registry.

Study success was based on an analysis of the primary endpoint (TVF at 180 days) and was directly compared with an expected performance criterion (22.4%). The null hypothesis was tested using the Clopper-Pearson exact upper 95% confidence interval on the observed 180-day TVF rate. The upper 95% confidence interval of the observed 180-day TVF rate was 10.4%, which was considerably lower than the expected performance criterion of 22.4%, enabling the rejection of the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The results of the VISION Registry supported the hypothesis of the protocol and demonstrated the 180-day safety and efficacy of this stent for the treatment of patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries.

View the summary of safety and effectiveness:

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf2/P020047b.pdf

View the product specifications and instructions for use:

MULTI-LINK VISION® Coronary Stent System


LT2922560